Saturday, 14 November 2026 · ☁ Nairobi Advertise With UsSubmit your StoryFacebookInstagramXYouTubeTelegramTikTok
Submit your story
Advertisement
News

NHIF On The Spot For Paying KSh 336 Million To Unqualified Law Firm

Kevin Koech · · 2 min read
NHIF Building in Nairobi PHOTO/COURTESY

The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) has once again been put on the spot for misuse of funds in the latest scandal.

According to a report by Auditor-General Nancy Gathungu, NHIF paid KSh 336.3 million to a law firm that had not been cleared to bid for tenders with health providers.

Advertisement

Notably, the drafting which was fully paid using the taxpayers money was not part of the NHIF approved procurement plan for 2018/2019.

Gathungu noted that the move went against the Public Procurement and Assets Disposal Act of 2015 which indicated that no money had been set aside for payment of legal service.

The report of the audited financial accounts also showed that a further KSh 156.4 million was paid to private law firms as legal fees.

Advertisement

The payment was made without approval from the Attorney General (AG).

The law firm which was approached to draft the contracts charged NHIF KSh 43 million.

The services included company search, printing, binding, travel costs, stamp duty and distribution of the contracts to the various hospitals and other health providers.

At the same time, KSh 432.8 million was paid as the negotiated instruction fee to draw 6,700 contracts.

Out of this amount, KSh 336.3 million was paid to the law firm meaning that each contract costs the taxpayer about KSh 65,000 to draft.

“Under the circumstances, NHIF was in breach of the law and the propriety of the legal fee paid to the law firm could not be confirmed,” the audit report said.

Elsewhere, the audit report also shows that the NHIF board spent KSh 32.1 million in sitting allowances among other expenses for 35 full board meetings and seven meetings for its audit committee in a year.

In the process, KSh 12.5 million was spent for the meetings in sitting allowances alone.

This means that the board violated its own approved calendar of five full board meetings and four audit committee meetings for the period under review.

Advertisement
Written by
Kevin Koech
I’m a digital-journalist writing on among other topics, governance, fraud, politics and business with over four years of experience in digital content creation with an incline in editing. I also have a background in digital marketing and bookings are open for those interested in training & consultation, social media marketing, SEO, Google & YouTube advertising, content writing and Wordpress website design. More from this author →

Speak your mind

Keep reading

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.